| The table below shows those
referenses in the essay "The Judgment against Hakan Lans - A
Planned Judicial Crime?" which are available by links.
The links are indicated in the order in which they appear in the
essay. Destination "I" means that the link leads to a file
on this website, and destination "O" that the link leads to
some other site on the web. |
|
| The name of the
link in the endnotes |
The destination of the
link |
Properties of the
link |
| The judgment |
I |
pdf, 562 KB |
|
The color graphics patent |
O |
|
|
The position indicating patent |
O |
|
|
The
contingency fee contract |
I |
pdf, 148 KB |
|
Lans's lawsuit
against AM&S |
I |
html, 298 KB |
| The assignment declaration |
I |
pdf,
37 KB |
| Memorandum |
I |
pdf, 61 KB |
|
The Federal Circuit's pronouncement |
O |
|
|
Code of Conduct for Lawyers in the European Union |
O |
|
|
The American Bar Association - Model Rules of
Professional Conduct |
O |
|
|
Bruce A.
Lehman's declaration |
I |
html, 74 KB |
|
Dunlap v. Schofield |
O |
|
|
Jaeckle, Fleischmann & Mugel |
O |
|
|
The proof |
I |
pdf, 24 KB |
| Utterstroms letter |
I |
pdf, 131 KB |
| The first flight |
I |
html, 11 KB |
| FAA's mission need statement |
I |
pdf, 209 KB |
|
STDMA for the US Navy |
O |
|
| SCAA v. PMEI |
I |
pdf, 118 KB |
| Application for
referral to the United States Attorney |
I |
pdf, 98 KB |
|
| Below are some further links which, even
if they are not referred to in the essay, still are of
interest in the context. |
|
Declaration of Arnon D. Siegel
to the district court of Columbia
(pdf-file, 1,3 MB). This document contains, among other things,
as exhibits, three interesting letters. The first is from Erika
Mann, Carlos Westendorp Y Cabeza and Goran Farm, members of the
European Parliament, to their colleagues. The second is from the
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Bruce Swartz at the US
Department of Justice. The third letter, finally, is from the
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs to William H. Taft at the US
Department of State.
|
|
Hakan Lans's
declaration
to the district court of Columbia (pdf-file,
74 KB). |
|
After 23 Years... Long and undue delays has been, and
is, a main characteristic of the color graphics lawsuit in
the District Court of the District of Columbia. To a large
extent these delays seem to be attributable to Judge John
Garrett Penn, who has a record of "long, unexplainable
delays" and "twice as many overdue rulings as his fellow
judges". An important consequence of Penn's inactivity just
now, August 2004, is that the statute of limitations
for Louis S. Mastriani's criminal perjury in the court (see the main
essay) threatens to expire without any action taken.
The link here leads to an interesting article about Judge
Penn's extreme way of delaying cases which was presented in
the Washington Post, April 12, 1999. |
|